Bernardo, we need to separate very differently our web-apps in two
parts: communication with flash client-side and HTML back-end
administration panel. So we have general app-wide logic and another
very specific logic for client-side that is general to all the
controllers that will be used in the communication with flash
(RemotingUsersController, etc).

On 15 ene, 19:15, Bernardo Vieira <[email protected]> wrote:
> Just one question though, why can't you just use app_controller for
> this? Or better yet, for added flexibility, put whatever you need in a
> component and use it in the controllers where you need remoting
> capabilities.
>
> Graham Weldon wrote:
> > Hey,
>
> > Better than including php files, use the CakePHP App::import() and
> > ClassRegistry::init() methods.
> > These locate, include and in the case of the ClassRegistry, instantiate and
> > return the object for you.
>
> > You would in this case, do something like:
>
> > App::import('Controller', 'RemotingController');
> > class RemotingUsersController extends RemotingController {
> >    /// implementation
> > }
>
> > Run a few tests with that, but its my understanding that this method should
> > make the components available for the RemotingUsersController class.
> > If not, ensuring that the __construct() passes back to the parent should
> > ensure that the parent class is processed properly, but this should happen
> > by default.
>
> > Try the App::import() and let me know how you go with the components.
>
> > Cheers,
> > Graham
>
> > On Thu, 15 Jan 2009 12:47:58 -0800 (PST), caminante
> > <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >> Being released 1.2 final version of CakePHP, I opened this discussion
> >> to try to bring some light together to this issue.
>
> >> My need:
> >> What's in the subject of this discussion; I have a couple of "special"
> >> controllers to be called from flash (through cakeswxphp). What I need
> >> is those controllers extending a "RemotingController" (with it's set
> >> of thingies for communication with flash) which in turn extends
> >> AppController. Sounded easy when I thought it, it's a common practice
> >> in OOP and I cannot see why it wouldn't be implemented in an OOP
> >> framework as CakePHP. Let's see:
>
> >> 1) class RemotingController extends AppController {}   // dir: app/ or
> >> app/controllers/
> >> 2) class RemotingUsersController extends RemotingController {}   //
> >> dir: app/controllers/
>
> >> When I make a request to an action in RemotingUsersController, "Class
> >> 'RemotingController' not found", either putting it at app/ or app/
> >> controllers/. Ok, CakePHP didn't noticed RemotingController class
> >> existed.
>
> >> There are a couple of (old or even antique) discussions on the
> >> subject:
>
> >http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php/browse_thread/thread/83bad7a3...
>
> >> (from 2005)
> >> and a more recent one:
>
> >http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php/browse_thread/thread/f3c62f08...
>
> >> (from mid 2007)
>
> >> Neither seemed to found a (nice?) way to do this and according to
> >> dates, they were discussing on different stages in the evolution of
> >> the framework.
> >> I applied something said in the first one, suggesting the following:
>
> >> require_once('parent_controller.php');
> >> class ChildController extends ParentController {}
>
> >> The requirement for the php file with my RemotingController class
> >> would work fine (though not being a pretty/frameworkian solution, but
> >> I can live with that). Now my class seems to be recognized by Cake but
> >> I have another problem: The components I declare for this class don't
> >> work ("Call to a member function requestedWith() on a non-object", for
> >> example). Seems that leaving a little bit the CakePHP "rigorous-
> >> mechanics/convention-over-configuration" of Cake, there are some
> >> things that stop working "automagically", such as automatic components
> >> initialization.
>
> >> My questions:
> >> How, then, can I initialize components? (and maybe why there's nothing
> >> in the book on this subject?)
> >> What can be the most practical and conventional way of doing what I
> >> need?
> >> Are others there that achieved good results with this?
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"CakePHP" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to