On 11 mayo, 03:29, shaggz <[email protected]> wrote:
> On May 10, 7:07 am, AD7six <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Hi shaggz,
>
> > Interesting stuff, why not take a look at writing a komodo wrapper for
> > the cakemate plugin (http://thechaw.com/cakemate) which puts most of
> > the logic in a cake shell.
>
> > In this way your marco would only need to construct the right
> > parameters for a cake-console call, and be able to parse the result.
>
> > AD
>
> Thanks for the feedback, Andy. I will take a look at the cakemate
> plugin and see what it offers. At first glance, it does seem to be
> the 'right' way to do something like this to keep it extensible.
>
> One thing that is confusing at first glance is the statement that
> CakeMate 'is designed to work in conjunction with the Textmate bundle,
> and *will not* work as a standalone.' When I looked at the textmate
> bundle sources,
I'll change it now.
That was the original project description, previously there were two
similar projects which were merged - the editor shell has no
dependencies outside of the one vendor class in the repo.
> I didn't see any cakephp files......only textmate
> snippets and code completion helpers. I guess I don't understand the
> dependency between CakeMate and the Cake Textmate bundle if one were
> using vim (or in this case, a komodo wrapper).
Nun
>
> Thanks
Cheers,
AD
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"CakePHP" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
