On 22 dic, 03:08, rchavik <[email protected]> wrote: > On Dec 22, 5:04 am, Adrenalin <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ > > > Do you mean "*No Derivative Works* — You may not alter, transform, or build > > upon this work." ? > > I don't think this apply here since only the media is different. AFAIK chm > > are just a bunch of html files. > > If not, then that mean when I save a page of manual (for local fast access), > > and my browser modify the original document to have local links, it's not > > allowed by this license ? I think that's stupid. > > > This CHM version is very useful (instant search in all the man, instant > > access even if no internet), so thank you Sergei. > > I would expect cakephp to do them self the CHM version rather than denying > > (by the license mean) the community to do that. > > It's very helpful to have a CHM version available. It's very handy to > have > a local and fast access to the book, and I particularly like the > search functionality. > > If this is a license violation, is it possible for cake foundation to > issue an official > CHM version of the cookbook?
See my reply here http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php/browse_thread/thread/69cc1b51032c7ebc/50c9ca082170d2e1#50c9ca082170d2e1 There is no denying the community - there are efforts to funnel community efforts correctly. AD Check out the new CakePHP Questions site http://cakeqs.org and help others with their CakePHP related questions. You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CakePHP" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
