Isn't it open source? Not the first time someone made a fork of it - including the original author. :)
On Jan 4, 10:31 pm, Juan Luis Baptiste <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 10:05 AM, hashmich <[email protected]> wrote: > > Oracle is going to take over Sun Microsystems - who are the owner of > > the copyrights for MySQL. > > I think you can imagine, what's the meaning of MySQL being taken over > > by its direct commercial competitor. > > I think you are overreacting, have you read Oracle's public position > on this ? I think not: > > http://www.marketwire.com/press-release/Oracle-Corporation-NASDAQ-ORC... > > basically it's a commitment to continue to develop and support MySQL > and it's customers (including increasing R&D budget of MySQL). Oracle > has no reason to end MySQL, they fit perfectly in their portfolio to > compete against MS SQL server in the SMB market. Oracle DB is too > expensive for a SMB to buy it so it will never go there, that's why > they need MySQL. IMO, those petitions and sites of "save MySQL" only > spreads FUD which is not good. Have you browsed Oracle's website and > research your self what is their position on this? take a look at this > FAQ on Sun acquisition: > > http://www.oracle.com/us/sun/038563.pdf > > There is, at least for now, nothing to worry about. It's the same FUD > and negative vibes that appeared when Sun bought MySQL. What happened? > nothing... > > Juancho Check out the new CakePHP Questions site http://cakeqs.org and help others with their CakePHP related questions. You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CakePHP" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
