Good to know. The 'alpha' designation has been scaring me off, since many (most?) developers use alpha to denote closed testing of not-yet- totally-stable code. So, I was going to wait until at least beta to adopt the new version. But maybe I'll try it out on an isolated branch.
- Jamie On Jan 11, 7:20 pm, "Larry E. Masters aka PhpNut" <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes all client work is on 1.3 > > -- > /** > * @author Larry E. Masters > * @var string $userName > * @param string $realName > * @returns string aka PhpNut > * @access public > */ > > On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 9:17 PM, Jamie <[email protected]> wrote: > > Is anyone using 1.3 on their live, high traffic production servers? > > I'm not just talking about blogs, but websites for paying clients and > > that sort of thing (no offense to the 1.3 bloggers out there!). I'm > > considering upgrading some of the domains I manage at my work to 1.3, > > but since it's still in alpha I'm not convinced of its stability just > > yet. > > > - Jamie > > > Check out the new CakePHP Questions sitehttp://cakeqs.organd help others > > with their CakePHP related questions. > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "CakePHP" group. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected]<cake-php%[email protected]>For > > more options, visit this group at > >http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
Check out the new CakePHP Questions site http://cakeqs.org and help others with their CakePHP related questions. You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CakePHP" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
