@Derico > I think you're missing the point here. I am not trying to assess the > supposed advantage in using CakePHP. > > I am trying to assess its weight. Whatever the application you > develop, when you choose using a framework you MUST understand how it > is going to affect the overall performance.
No, I still believe it is you who is missing the point here. You don't road test a Ferrari 599 and a Toyota Prius against the same set of criteria. Whilst they are both cars and can ferry a person from A to B, that's where the similarities end as they are totally different machines designed to achieve different things. What you are doing is comparable to testing an updated version of the Ferrari 599 against the outgoing model using the criteria set for the Toyota Prius. It's just wrong! To put a framework through it's paces you have to test the framework itself, all your testing is the frameworks ability to extract it's config options and read a few .htaccess rules ... how does that provide any significant results? However, I do agree with your assessment of Robert! @Walther: > and to throw a spanner into the works a simple php file with only echo >'Hello world' in gets 3604 requests per second > >I therefor conclude that CakePHP is faster then no framework at >all.... ROFL, excellent conclusion .. does that not prove benchmarking "hello world" is pointless?!? Check out the new CakePHP Questions site http://cakeqs.org and help others with their CakePHP related questions. You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CakePHP" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
