Nginx is fast in general, who ever said it was for static content? I use Nginx with memcache/apc and get a good 10k hits a day with no speed penalty.
Want kind of traffic are you expecting where none of these would suffice? Even the largest of sites use apache. On Jan 14, 2:29 am, "Dave Maharaj" <[email protected]> wrote: > I am trying to get the best suited server going for my app I am building and > so far > > From what I read: > > . Apache seems to be the dead horse / big and clumsy > > . Lighttpd is not as supported / updated as it once was > > . Nginx is fast with static content > > . Cherokee leaves me wondering. > > The site im working on has maybe 5 - 10 static nothing changing pages(just > welcome / register / login / contact) but once you login everything is per > user since there are a lot of custom settings so caching pages / parts seems > like not the best solution for nginx (sure Apache backend but if 95% would > be processed thru Apache whats the point for nginx for the few pages > really?) > > All my data / queries are cached for dynamic pages since each users page > consists of various modules that constantly changing entire view caching is > impossible. > > So that basically leaves me with Cherokee left to try. Anyone use it? > Reviews? Good bad? > > I just installed nginx and tuned it up tried this and that, APC, Memcache > but its not much faster pushing out my the dynamic content over Apache so I > was thinking of giving Cherokee a go and just looking for opinions / > feedback? > > Thanks, > > Dave Check out the new CakePHP Questions site http://cakeqs.org and help others with their CakePHP related questions. You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CakePHP" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
