On 7/31/16 10:29 AM, Loganaden Velvindron wrote: > Thanks, and here's the result with transmission running on another box > in the house: > > https://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/4583052 > > Something that I notice right away is that it seems that CAKE has less > "burstiness" than fq_codel in simple.qos configuration. > > Btw, I'm using piece of cake as the QoS profile.
Well, I would try to stress it out harder against a more local netperf server. If you can set one up on a data center in your country I can toss it into the global dns as "netperf-something.bufferbloat.net" > > > > On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 12:16 PM, Dave Taht <[email protected]> wrote: >> Pretty impressive result. >> >> On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 10:13 AM, Loganaden Velvindron >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Hi folks, >>> >>> Got myself an archer c7 v2 with lede: (HEAD, r1185), on a 30Mbit/s >>> (download) and 4Mbit/s upload. >>> >>> here is the result using dslreports: >>> https://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/4582998. >>> >>> It looks to be working fine to me so far. >>> >>> capacity estimate: 3Mbit >>> Tin 0 >>> thresh 3Mbit >>> target 15.0ms >>> interval 300.0ms >>> pk_delay 790us >>> av_delay 318us >>> sp_delay 10us >>> pkts 23772 >>> bytes 10352566 >>> way_inds 0 >>> way_miss 295 >>> way_cols 0 >>> drops 56 >>> marks 0 >>> sp_flows 1 >>> bk_flows 1 >>> un_flows 0 >>> max_len 1514 >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Cake mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake >> >> >> >> -- >> Dave Täht >> Let's go make home routers and wifi faster! With better software! >> http://blog.cerowrt.org > _______________________________________________ > Cake mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake > _______________________________________________ Cake mailing list [email protected] https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake
