Many apologies, the link should be, http://imgur.com/6DrMJKI.
On 24 August 2016 at 18:01, techic...@gmail.com <techic...@gmail.com> wrote: > I have today been using flent to do RRUL tests with the values set at 50%. > > I have uploaded the first test I have performed. It can be seen at, > http://imgur.com/6DrMJKI. > > I'm a bit confused why the DS speed is only 7Mb/s when every other speed > test I have done is around 28Mb/s (as it should be). Can anyone explain why > this might be? Am I doing something wrong? > > I would appreciate an expert analysis of the graph, if possible :) > > On 23 August 2016 at 21:09, Sebastian Moeller <moell...@gmx.de> wrote: > >> Hello techicist, >> >> On August 23, 2016 5:13:19 PM GMT+02:00, "techic...@gmail.com" < >> techic...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >Hello, >> > >> >Thank you for your quick reply. >> > >> >I take it that one of the DHCPs should read PPPoE? >> > >> > >> >Yes, you are quite correct. It should read: "TalkTalk uses DHCP to >> >obtain >> >an IP address and not PPPoE as most other ISPs do." But I think you >> >understood that :) >> > >> >My sync speeds on VDSL2 have been very stable for the last 84+ days so >> >my >> >calculated figures will stay the same for some time, I would like to >> >think. >> >> Yes, that is what I see as well. >> >> >My DS sync speed is 58976Kbps and thus I have calculated a reference >> >value >> >of 58068Kbps based on your formula. The US sync speed is 10422Kbps and >> >the >> >reference value for this is 10261Kbps. >> > >> >Setting the reference values to 50%, I have: 29034Kbps for the DS; and >> >5130Kbps for the US. I will test with these numbers shortly. Am I right >> >to >> >assume I can just paste these into the SQM interface on LuCI? >> >> Yes, that should work. >> >> >I will set >> >the "Queuing discipline" to *cake* and the "Queue setup script" to >> >*piece_of_cake.qos*. >> > >> >I assume also at this stage, to set "Which link layer to account for" >> >as *none >> >(default)*? >> >> Should work, but also Ethernet should work, as long as you do not >> specify anything, or rather -14 ;) >> >> > >> >I will then increment the values I have pasted into LuCI (assuming that >> >is >> >correct) as you have said. At this point, with an assumed overhead of >> >8, do >> >I just choose *Ethernet with overhead...* and then set the "Per Packet >> >Overhead (byte)" to *8*? >> >> Yes. In essence that is the trick, it might make sense to look at cake' >> statistics especially the max length field, which if you have lla set at >> none reach 1514 if the kernel automatically adds it's 14 bytes. >> >> >> > >> >Is there any benefit of going through UCI? >> >> Only if you despise the GUI or only have ssh access, I guess... >> Functionally it should boil down to the same, as the GUI simply fills >> /etc/config/sqm with values and then calls /etc/init.d/sqm to actually >> start the scripts... >> >> Best Regards >> Sebastian >> >> >> > >> > >> >------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> > >> >_______________________________________________ >> >Cake mailing list >> >Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net >> >https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake >> >> -- >> Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. >> > >
_______________________________________________ Cake mailing list Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake