On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 5:48 PM, Aaron Wood <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 5:41 PM, Dave Taht <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 5:32 PM, Aaron Wood <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Toke, >> > >> > Do you know if it's made it into the LEDE nightlies, yet? I loaded up >> > the >> > Dec 22 nightly onto my WNDR3800. Running rrul I'm getting about 10-30ms >> > of >> > latency over wired on the same link (and wifi is definitely the limit, >> > as >> >> I'm assuming you meant wireless above? > > > Yes. > >> >> > it's using piece_of_cake at 135M down, 12M up (and I'm seeing 0 >> > measurable >> >> I really don't recommend cake at much greater than 60Mbits on this >> hardware inbound. > > > I, however, am _very_ happy with the results at those levels (using piece of > cake, not layer-cake, layer-cake is flapping bandwidth between BK and the > rest in my tests).
Impressive. I haven't gone and measured cake recently on low end routers. Certainly less classes helps it. It would be good if this performance level is true for the current implementation with a single queue. >> It's not clear to me if the quantum and codel targets were restored to >> their defaults in this release (300->1514, 20ms -> 5ms) > > > And... my WRT running OpenWRT CC is using quantum 300, target 5ms. The actual target and quantum are in one of the sysfs aqm files, I believe. Also I note most of the benefit of the new wifi code is at lower rates from your AP. Try moving 20 or more feet away.... > > -Aaron -- Dave Täht Let's go make home routers and wifi faster! With better software! http://blog.cerowrt.org _______________________________________________ Cake mailing list [email protected] https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake
