> On 31 Jan, 2017, at 16:49, Felix Resch <[email protected]> wrote: > > Since we now already do the conntrack-lookup for the nat keyword, would it be > expensive to implement a kind of internal conntrack-mark-and-restore by > cake-tin? > > E.g. when traffic leaves throu canke tin#x, the conntrack entry will get a > fwmark and return traffic is put in the corresponding tin/bin on the ingress > cake.
That’s an interesting idea. At this point I don’t know how easy it is to implement, though. Certainly we need to clean up some other things first. - Jonathan Morton _______________________________________________ Cake mailing list [email protected] https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake
