because cobalt is more aggressive than codel. I've never believed in it. I'm sitting here trying to figure out how to get good ole regular cake to compile again.
I just merged the new ack stuff into the codel branch. On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 2:13 PM, G. Amanakis via Cake <cake@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote: > _______________________________________________ > Cake mailing list > Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: "G. Amanakis" <g_amana...@yahoo.com> > To: Dave Taht <d...@taht.net>, George Amanakis via Cake > <cake@lists.bufferbloat.net> > Cc: > Bcc: > Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2017 17:13:16 -0500 > Subject: Re: [Cake] total download rate with many flows > Yes, it is. I am building from the cobalt branch. What makes you believe > otherwise? Would you expect a different behaviour? > > On November 14, 2017 3:11:04 PM EST, Dave Taht <d...@taht.net> wrote: >> >> George Amanakis via Cake <cake@lists.bufferbloat.net> writes: >> >>> From: George Amanakis <g_amana...@yahoo.com> >>> Subject: Re: [Cake] total download rate with many flows >>> To: David Lang <da...@lang.hm> >>> Cc: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net >>> Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2017 21:49:53 -0500 (17 hours, 20 minutes, 42 seconds >>> ago) >>> >>> Dear David, >>> >>> I agree. My point is that currently ingress mode seems to be dropping more >>> packets than necessary to keep senders from bottlenecking the connection >>> (when >>> there is a large number of concurrent flows, >8). And right now, ingress >>> mode is >>> the only mode that achieves this in situations such as Windows updates. >> >> >> Is cobalt enabled in your build? > > > -- > Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. > -- Dave Täht CEO, TekLibre, LLC http://www.teklibre.com Tel: 1-669-226-2619 _______________________________________________ Cake mailing list Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake
