Pete Heist <[email protected]> writes: > On Nov 15, 2017, at 8:44 PM, Dave Taht <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > I dearly would like to try and submit cake to mainline linux in > december. Getting it done is going to take group effort. > > And trying to cover all the corner cases, is going to take co-ordination > and scripting, and perhaps we should switch to google docs to pull > together. > > Also, it might be fun to schedule a dramatic reading of the source code > via videoconference because theres a lot in cake that not enough people > (except maybe jonathan) understand. > > > That sounds good. Rather than my making some test plan, if you start a doc > just > plug me in where you think it’s best.
I'll try to review what's been discussed so far and get a document out by sunday. BTW, all, I have reserved time on the "vuc" conference december 15th to discuss where we are in the bufferbloat project. That's more of a "meet the press" kind of thing than the internal discussion here. > > There’s also been a Cake support feature request hanging around in the EdgeOS > forums for a while after Lochnair’s successful work to get it built for the > EdgeRouter firmware: > > https://community.ubnt.com/t5/EdgeMAX-Feature-Requests/Cake-shaper-support/idi-p/1885749 I had viewed those folk as a key path to commercialization. They have a great user community and great products. > Maybe this would help get it pushed through into a device that I think has > pretty wide deployment… The problem is, they were stuck on kernel 3.10, when last I looked and oy... I keep hoping we can get cavium to pay attention directly. _______________________________________________ Cake mailing list [email protected] https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake
