Pete Heist <[email protected]> writes: > On Nov 19, 2017, at 9:41 PM, Dave Taht <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Yep with bql. I hadn’t thought about mq before. What my qos setup scripts > are > doing though is replacing the root qdisc (which now I see defaults to > mq) with a > single cake instance. With bql, should rather be leaving mq and > putting > four > cake instances underneath it? > > Only if you want unlimited mode, and birthday problems, and don't have > cpu to burn. > > > Ok, if I compare the two, latency under load for rrul_be looks “better” > (~1-1.5ms instead of ~3ms) with a single “cake unlimited besteffort lan” > instance instead of four of them underneath mq.
Yep. Adding more unmanaged queues doesn't help. However it should spread the load across more cpus. _______________________________________________ Cake mailing list [email protected] https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake
