Hi Kevin, hi all,
On December 24, 2017 11:46:31 AM GMT+01:00, Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>> On 24 Dec 2017, at 10:39, Jonathan Morton <[email protected]>
>wrote:
>>
>> If you combine the 'raw' keyword with an overhead spec, that disables
>the hard_header_len compensation.
>>
>> - Jonathan Morton
>
>Indeed. I think all I’m proving is ‘make something idiot
>proof…..they’ll only go and improve the idiot’… i.e. me :-)
Haha, funny ;). But with the current state of the cake correcting for
hard_header_len, while this is not guaranteed to be the overhead the kernel
adds to skb->Len; I would claim cake is not idiot proof, but rather has a very
tricky default mode...
I do add that reporting max_len_after_overhead_accounting in addition to
max_len would have made it much more likely to catch this behaviour much
earlier...
Best Regards & happy holidays
Sebastian
>
>
>Happy holiday season to all. I’m off to find another trap to fall into
>;-)
>
>Cheers,
>
>Kevin D-B
>
>012C ACB2 28C6 C53E 9775 9123 B3A2 389B 9DE2 334A
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
_______________________________________________
Cake mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake
