Pete Heist <p...@eventide.io> writes: >> On Apr 24, 2018, at 7:58 AM, Jonathan Morton <chromati...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Turning NAT support on by default might actually be reasonable, since >> it doesn't really break anything if it's not needed - it just eats a >> bit of CPU with unnecessary conntrack lookups. > > I would be for it, if it eats say < 1% additional CPU, and preferably > less. I expect the impact to increase with packet rates.
I'm a bit worried that the way it is implemented now, if we turn it on by default we risk activating conntrack even when it was otherwise disabled... That would be a bad side effect, so I think it's better to be safe and leave it for userspace to enable (which, again, we could do by default in sqm-scripts). -Toke _______________________________________________ Cake mailing list Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake