Sebastian Moeller <moell...@gmx.de> writes: >> Looking at those threads, they seem to be increasing the number of >> queues. Not sure they need to, but, well, there's nothing in principle >> that says this couldn't be configurable (it is in FQ-CoDel). It would >> need a bit of a reorg of the current code, though, so that would be a >> thing for later I guess... > > I had hoped that orangetek could be convinced to do measurements > with different number of queues to answer that question, but I > guess the current default of 1000 queues is decent for a typical > homenet, but will simply become a bit tight with 600 concurrent > households (I assume that its the peak usage that would want > more queues on the "back-haul", on average 1000 might still be > okay, especially with Jonathan's clever set associativity > design)
Well, there's https://www.researchgate.net/profile/S_Oueslati/publication/247045479_On_the_Scalability_of_Fair_Queueing/links/5451fab10cf285a067c6af0a/On-the-Scalability-of-Fair-Queueing.pdf -Toke _______________________________________________ Cake mailing list Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake
