I wish vumatel the best of luck. One thing that still will help the fiber networks is applying fq_* derived algoritms.
This is cake vs sonic (gpon) fiber in san francisco. They have a totally reasonable (60ms) buffer in their ONT, cut to... well... the result I get is even less latency loaded than unloaded: http://www.taht.net/~d/sonic_106_cake_vs_default.png In my mind fq techniques merely on the up on fiber onts will make a huge difference in perceived QoE, and the marketing department can keep claiming it's fiber bandwidth that counts to consumers. FIOS uses actiontec. I haven't picked apart what kernels the use in a couple years. http://opensource.actiontec.com/ (hey verizon FIOS? gfiber? you listening?) On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 9:45 AM Tristan Seligmann <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Mon, 23 Jul 2018 at 17:26 Jonas Mårtensson <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 4:56 PM Dave Taht <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Great info, thx. Using this opportunity to rant about city-wid >>> networks, I'd have done something so different >>> than what the governments and ISPs have inflicted on us, substituting >>> redundancy for reliability. >>> >>> I'd have used bog standard ethernet over fiber instead of gpon. >> >> >> Well, in Sweden 100% of ftth connections are standard active ethernet >> instead of gpon (and more than 60% of fixed connections are ftth). > > > Here in South Africa, we have one provider (Vumatel) deploying AE, and > everyone else doing GPON :/ -- Dave Täht CEO, TekLibre, LLC http://www.teklibre.com Tel: 1-669-226-2619 _______________________________________________ Cake mailing list [email protected] https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake
