> On 4 Aug, 2018, at 11:11 am, Dave Taht <[email protected]> wrote: > > https://sci-hub.tw/10.1109/CNSM.2014.7014160
Looks like an advance over the status quo (as illustrated by Google's paper) with respect to policers. The basic TBF-type policer is pretty crap; really not hard to do better if you bother to think about it. I'm still not *entirely* convinced that we can't have real DRR++/Codel implementations at line rate in hardware. I think nobody has even seriously tried to do it. Getting to that point would potentially obsolete policers overnight, at least from a theoretical point of view. Meanwhile, we can still do a lot at the gigabit-per-subscriber level in software. - Jonathan Morton _______________________________________________ Cake mailing list [email protected] https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake
