Shefali Gupta <[email protected]> writes: > Hello Jonathan and Dave, > > Thanks for the quick replies. > > We took sometime to understand the whole framework and have come up > with some more queries: > > 1. Can we use the COBALT code available on the following link as a > reference: > https://github.com/dtaht/sch_cake/blob/old-master/cobalt.c > > 2. Since ns-3 code is in C++, we're hoping to implement the different > modules (four modules as mentioned in LANMAN paper) of Cake in > separate classes. > Is that approach fine? or you recommend us to implement all modules in > a single file as done in Linux?
I see jon has a later reply to this, this is just a note. I would in the long run, really like to see a C++ boost library implementing all the bufferbloat-fighting algorithms generically - I tend to think that GPS fair and load-shedding and rate-limiting behavior would be a boon in many applications. I started work once on doing something generic in userspace in C but, well, go do a "man queue" and recoil in horror. I should stick that somewhere and tie myself to the chair long enough to finish it. hmm... perhaps Go? > > Thanks and Regards, > Shefali Gupta > Jendaipou Palmei > > _______________________________________________ > Cake mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake _______________________________________________ Cake mailing list [email protected] https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake
