Pete Heist <p...@heistp.net> writes: > That first bug report looks decidedly similar to mine, but Toke would > have to comment on the specifics. So far I see the patch to > sch_codel.c you mentioned and another two-liner to remove the warning > in hfsc.c (https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/933611/). It would be > really good to know that that warning is truly bogus, that it wasn’t > put there by the author for good reason, as Toke may have been > thinking of a different way to fix hfsc.
Well, it's the same WARN_ON(), and if that patch had been applied, debugging our issue would have been a lot harder, I think. But the underlying issue is different, and we still need to fix HFSC (and probably CAKE as well). > Thanks for bringing this up! I see that I ought to search > OpenWRT/kernel.org next time… :) Yeah, nice find. I'll make sure that CAKE doesn't suffer from the same issue that https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg450655.html fixes for CoDel while I'm writing patches... :) -Toke _______________________________________________ Cake mailing list Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake