> On Mar 1, 2019, at 12:01 PM, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <[email protected]> wrote: > > Pete Heist <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> writes: > >> That said, unless there’s an obvious reason for this that’s fixable, >> I’m fine with how it is, considering the improvement. :) > > Cool! And you haven't seen any regressions in other usage? :)
To be honest, today’s the first time I tried it and I haven’t done any testing on it beyond fairness. (So, ship it!) At least, I haven’t seen any other problems in this one-armed routing scenario or a regular host to host scenario. Host fairness seems “mostly good" no matter what values I choose for the number of flows of the four clients, flow fairness still looks good, and I don’t see any problems starting and stopping different numbers of flows mid-test. Pete
_______________________________________________ Cake mailing list [email protected] https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake
