Dear All,
just as a side-note. I believe that ACK filtering is one more application that
directly profits from flow-queueing (as the set of packets to compare with is
already separated out from the set of all queued packets), as one needs to
collect ACKs according to their 4-Tuples which FQ does naturally.
Best Regards
Sebastian
> On May 7, 2020, at 09:07, Sebastian Moeller <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> I think that you will remove all redundant Backs in one go considerably
> advancing the new ACK in the queue. And more importantly, in most relevant
> modes cake will apply one queue per flow stochastically, so almost all
> packet's in a reverse ACK flow will be ACK with identical 5-tupel....
>
> On 7 May 2020 08:44:59 CEST, Avakash bhat <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Thanks for the quick response. I also had a followup question.
>
> If the ack filter adds the new ack to the tail of the queue after removing an
> ack from the queue, won't it be starving the ack?
> The replaced ack was much ahead in the queue than the ack we replaced at the
> tail right?
>
> Thanks,
> Avakash Bhat
>
> --
> Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
> _______________________________________________
> Cake mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake
_______________________________________________
Cake mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake
