https://forum.openwrt.org/t/making-cake-multicore-or-other-new-features/112623
On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 11:32 PM Dave Taht <dave.t...@gmail.com> wrote: > > The context of my question is basically this: > > Is cake baked? Is it done? > > Is there anything from libreQos that would be better in C? > > On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 11:17 PM Dave Taht <dave.t...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 11:07 PM Sebastian Moeller <moell...@gmx.de> wrote: > > > > > > Hi Dave, > > > > > > > > > On 23 November 2021 06:03:03 CET, Dave Taht <dave.t...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >ages ago I'd (we'd? I really don't remember - forgive me if I've > > > >forgotten who actually leaned in on it) written a basic ack-filter in > > > >ebpf. this was before cake gained tc actions and my primary use for > > > >the tech was for asymmetric connections, and before the good > > > >ack-filter arrived, and I was (and remain) unfriendly to this level of > > > >dpi. > > > > > > > >That said, on a symmetric connection, deprioritizing pure acks to the > > > >5% background queue nd then turning the cake ack-filter loose on it > > > >might actually work. > > > > > > > >Am I on drugs/is there any point? > > > > > > I think at leat when using multiple priority tins forward and reverse > > > traffic should by default use the same tin (I can see non-standard > > > situations that want differential treatment). The argument is that unlike > > > earlier attempts at ingress shaping that tried to throttle reverse ACKs? > > > cake/codel do proper 'hit the brakes' signalling via marking/dropping and > > > we want that signal to reach the other end as quickly as possible, no? > > > > My thought was basically an optional filter that steered all pure acks > > (no matter the classification) into the background queue. > > Non-pure-acks (sacks) essentially jump the background queue and signal > > that loss earlier. The backlog of other acks in background get > > delivered out of order, but purely out of order and discarded by the > > reciever. > > > > > Regards > > > Sebastian > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >-- > > > >I tried to build a better future, a few times: > > > >https://wayforward.archive.org/?site=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.icei.org > > > > > > > >Dave Täht CEO, TekLibre, LLC > > > >_______________________________________________ > > > >Cake mailing list > > > >Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net > > > >https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake > > > > > > -- > > > Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. > > > > > > > > -- > > I tried to build a better future, a few times: > > https://wayforward.archive.org/?site=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.icei.org > > > > Dave Täht CEO, TekLibre, LLC > > > > -- > I tried to build a better future, a few times: > https://wayforward.archive.org/?site=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.icei.org > > Dave Täht CEO, TekLibre, LLC -- I tried to build a better future, a few times: https://wayforward.archive.org/?site=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.icei.org Dave Täht CEO, TekLibre, LLC _______________________________________________ Cake mailing list Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake
