> On 25 Jan 2022, at 10:58, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <t...@redhat.com> wrote: > > Matt Johnston <m...@codeconstruct.com.au> writes: > >> The CS1 priority (index 0x08) was changed from 0 to 1 when LE (index >> 0x01) was added. This looks unintentional, it doesn't match the >> docs and CS1 shouldn't be the same tin as AF1x > > Hmm, Kevin, any comments? > > -Toke >
I’ll have to find my thinking head & time machine :-) This would be a lot easier if we had ‘diffserv9’, LE could have simply been added as the ‘if you’ve really nothing better to do’ class that it is. And it’s why I’ve personally argued for a diffserv5: lowest;low;normal;high;highest moving on. I think I screwed up when LE was added to diffserv8 - Matt the CS1 change from 0 to 1 IS intentional and IIRC I tried to bump everything else up 1 to compensate.. I may have missed some things though. Cheers, Kevin D-B gpg: 012C ACB2 28C6 C53E 9775 9123 B3A2 389B 9DE2 334A
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
_______________________________________________ Cake mailing list Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake
