On 14.04.2009, at 05:48, CalendarServer wrote:
I'm still mulling over the implications of this long-term. At
CalConnect in June, we plan to talk about shared calendars and work
out some ideas about any standards implications.
Hm, OK.
I'd be more willing if we could refuse to allow attendees on group
calendars (which would trigger scheduling), but I'm not sure that
this would satisfy everyone or whether that would require much
effort to enforce (guessing not much effort).
Well, obviously it should allow attendees. But why would that trigger
scheduling.
I would just make a distinction between a calendar which is scheduled
and one which is not (just like in CalDAV ...).
You could then use a non-scheduled calendar for groups now and bump it
to a scheduled one later if you worked out the implications. Clients
need to deal with both anyways.
Thanks,
Helge
--
Helge Hess
http://zideone.com/
_______________________________________________
calendarserver-dev mailing list
calendarserver-dev@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/calendarserver-dev
