Hi,
I'm a little puzzled by the change in this ticket to completely remove
the ACL method.
I realize that it'll make it easier for a specific application of
calendarserver, in which the client doesn't offer ACL control and access
is defined by predefined group or proxy principals, but it would make
the calendarserver a lot less general a tool.
It would also conflict with rfc4791 section 2.
What are the arguments for doing this ? - aside from not having to solve
the original problem i ticket 148.
/Peter
_______________________________________________
calendarserver-dev mailing list
calendarserver-dev@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/calendarserver-dev