hi,
Andre LaBranche-2 wrote: > > Yes, that is expected in your configuration, for this ancient version. In > your version, there is a python software load balancer that distributes > requests to available instances. You now have three available instances > and not one, so it's expected to see additional listeners. > ok, this sounds reasonable. Andre LaBranche-2 wrote: > > There is, however, one additional variable that affects concurrency, the > config variable MaxRequests. > hm, where can i find this variable? i didn't see it in caldav.plist... Andre LaBranche-2 wrote: > > Just to set your expectation, doing such a large-distance upgrade > successfully (when there is data to be maintained / upgraded) will be a > lot of work. > do you mean an upgrade from 2.4 to 3.x? i'm a little bit curios what you mean by *a lot of work*. my naive approach would be: set up the server, migrate all *.ics files and go to lunch :) kinds regards, emport -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Performance-and-Parallel-Requests-to-Calendarserver-tp34103740p34109685.html Sent from the Calendar Server - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ calendarserver-users mailing list calendarserver-users@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/calendarserver-users
