On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 18:54, Brian LeRoux <[email protected]> wrote:
> Ok, so a setter --- think that was the key missing piece of info. b/c > this is behavioral we'd probably be better off making it a function > call: > > CB.supportOrientation(0, 180) > Quick +1 on not using setters/getters. Pain to deal with, IMO, from a debugging point of view. One less thing for users to learn - they already know how to use functions, setters/getters are ... different. Oh, and you can't naturally define them in CoffeeScript :-) -- Patrick Mueller http://muellerware.org
