I just tagged Android to 1.3.0rc2 which is basically unchanged from 1.3.0rc1. I'm going to send out my rough test plan either later today or early tomorrow.
Simon Mac Donald http://hi.im/simonmacdonald On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 8:15 PM, Steven Gill <stev...@adobe.com> wrote: > Just a reminder that code freeze and rc2 will be on Monday. I am going > make a blog post for the changes in 1.3 when we release on Friday. > > I will take a look at the short logs and issue tracker, but was wondering > if any of you have anything to add other than general bug fixes. > > Also thinking about doing a post on how to upgrade from 1.2 to 1.3. > > -Steve > > On 11-12-07 12:44 PM, "Brian LeRoux" <b...@brian.io> wrote: > >>we need to be consistent on tag naming when we automate release building >> >> >>On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 2:04 AM, Jesse <purplecabb...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Windows Phone has been tagged >>> https://github.com/callback/callback-windows-phone/tags >>> However, It is tagged 1.3.rc1 >>> >>> On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 1:57 PM, Filip Maj <f...@adobe.com> wrote: >>> >>>> + ... 1 ? >>>> >>>> On 11-12-01 1:11 PM, "Simon MacDonald" <simon.macdon...@gmail.com> >>>>wrote: >>>> >>>> >Do we need to vote on this? Sorry couldn't resist. >>>> > >>>> >Simon Mac Donald >>>> >http://hi.im/simonmacdonald >>>> > >>>> > >>>> >On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 4:09 PM, Michael Brooks >>>> ><mich...@michaelbrooks.ca>wrote: >>>> > >>>> >> Simon - I agree. I really like a release schedule that uses release >>>> >> candidates and reserves a few days for solid testing. I appreciate >>>>you >>>> >> suggesting it for 1.3.0! >>>> >> >>>> >> Ken - There's a JIRA and GitHub ticket for the issue, so we can >>>>move the >>>> >> conversation there. I could use some help testing it once the patch >>>>is >>>> >>in >>>> >> place. >>>> >> >>>> >> Michael >>>> >> >>>> >> On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 1:05 PM, Simon MacDonald >>>> >> <simon.macdon...@gmail.com>wrote: >>>> >> >>>> >> > I have no problem with the change of tag name or you getting code >>>>into >>>> >> the >>>> >> > release by the 12th. I'm just thinking we need to leave a few days >>>> >>13-15 >>>> >> to >>>> >> > do some testing and make sure we haven't broken anything. >>>> >> > >>>> >> > Simon Mac Donald >>>> >> > http://hi.im/simonmacdonald >>>> >> > >>>> >> > >>>> >> > On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 4:03 PM, Michael Brooks >>>> >><mich...@michaelbrooks.ca >>>> >> > >wrote: >>>> >> > >>>> >> > > I like it Simon. >>>> >> > > >>>> >> > > I'd suggest tagging as "1.3.0rc1" instead of "1.3.0_rc1" >>>> >> > > >>>> >> > > I would like to squeak in OS X support for BlackBerry. Should I >>>>have >>>> >> this >>>> >> > > completed by Monday December 5th or Monday December 12th? >>>> >> > > >>>> >> > > Michael >>>> >> > > >>>> >> > > On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 12:44 PM, Simon MacDonald >>>> >> > > <simon.macdon...@gmail.com>wrote: >>>> >> > > >>>> >> > > > Hey all, >>>> >> > > > >>>> >> > > > For the upcoming 1.3 release can we throw down a few dates? >>>>Our >>>> >>last >>>> >> > > > release, 1.2, was tagged and released the same day. I can't >>>>say >>>> >>for >>>> >> > > certain >>>> >> > > > but I'm guessing the rush was to get it out before the Adobe >>>> >> > announcement >>>> >> > > > but we are lucky we didn't have major problems with that >>>>release >>>> >>as >>>> >> we >>>> >> > > were >>>> >> > > > a bit light on end to end testing. >>>> >> > > > >>>> >> > > > Since we are thinking about releasing 1.3 on December 16th I >>>> >>thought >>>> >> > I'd >>>> >> > > > work back a bit to identify some milestones. >>>> >> > > > >>>> >> > > > Dec 5th - Tag all repos as 1.3.0_rc1 >>>> >> > > > Dec 12th - Tag all repos as 1.3.0_rc2 and implement a code >>>>freeze >>>> >> > > > Dec 13th - Dec 14th - testing, testing, testing >>>> >> > > > Dec 15th - Tag all repos as 1.3.0 >>>> >> > > > Dec 16th - package and release PhoneGap 1.3 >>>> >> > > > >>>> >> > > > Basically we shouldn't be adding new code the week of the 12th >>>> >>unless >>>> >> > we >>>> >> > > > have broken something that we discover doing regression >>>>testing. >>>> >> > > > >>>> >> > > > These are only suggestions folks but what do you think about a >>>> >>little >>>> >> > > more >>>> >> > > > process this time around? >>>> >> > > > >>>> >> > > > Simon Mac Donald >>>> >> > > > http://hi.im/simonmacdonald >>>> >> > > > >>>> >> > > >>>> >> > >>>> >> >>>> >>>> >
