Many companies (cough, eg. Rim) include in their employment contract that all work done by an employee, unless specifically excluded, is owned by the company. In those scenarios, the individual usually can't sign an ICLA as it is not applicable. This is often a point of contention in many open source projects. It would be good to clarify the Apache stance, as for example, Gord and I have NOT signed/submitted ICLA's.
----- Original Message ----- From: Filip Maj [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2011 07:35 PM To: [email protected] <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Callback CCLA questions >Two questions: > >1. If a contributor's corporation has submitted a CCLA, does the >contributor have to sign an iCLA? (my hunch is no) Pretty sure it's a YES - just like us, we had to submit both. >2. How do I verify that a corporation has submitted their CCLA so I >can merge in a patch? There was a link floating around somewhere earlier... Check the mailing list archives? > >For reference, see: >https://github.com/callback/callback-ios/pull/36 --------------------------------------------------------------------- This transmission (including any attachments) may contain confidential information, privileged material (including material protected by the solicitor-client or other applicable privileges), or constitute non-public information. Any use of this information by anyone other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately reply to the sender and delete this information from your system. Use, dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this transmission by unintended recipients is not authorized and may be unlawful.
