On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 13:30, Andrew Lunny <alu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 30 December 2011 16:20, Ross Gardler <rgard...@opendirective.com> > wrote: > > > On Dec 30, 2011 11:32 PM, "Andrew Lunny" <alu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Does anyone know if the JUnit jar is safe to redistribute with Apache > > > products? It is under the Common Public License, available here: > > > https://github.com/KentBeck/junit/blob/master/LICENSE > > > In this case you will find that the CPL is permitted in binary form with > > appropriate labelling. > Quick note, which I don't believe is applicable to JUnit, but may be applicable to other things. As I was investigating the CPL issue w/r/t Eclipse SWT, I came to the same conclusion as Ross mentioned. You can ship binaries with appropriate labelling. Unfortunately, as I dug deeper into the issue, I found that the SWT code actually has additional license goop associated with it, for some of the platforms (eg, MPL for the linux version, IIRC). "It's complicated". :-) I've decided that I can live without the Eclipse SWT code for the time being. -- Patrick Mueller http://muellerware.org
