BlackBerry is up to date as well. On 12-01-03 12:12 PM, "Brian LeRoux" <b...@brian.io> wrote:
>my plan to spend some time updating our wiki w/ our process. >essentially its the same as today except we treat the ASF repo as >canonical, review commits from outside and ensure they have a CLA, etc > >On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 11:56 AM, Bryce Curtis <curtis.br...@gmail.com> >wrote: >> I was able to set up git and clone, so Android must be good. Are we >>ready >> to use the apache git for commits from now on? How are pull requests >>made >> and what is the easiest way to commit/approve them? >> >> >> On 1/3/12 1:27 PM, Patrick Mueller wrote: >>> >>> On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 14:08, Joe Bowser<bows...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> I've synced up the changes for Cordova-Android, and after going >>>>through >>>> the >>>> process, I think it makes sense if each platform maintainer just does >>>>a >>>> push up to their respective repositories the changes that they have >>>>been >>>> maintaining to date. This way, we can be sure that most people are >>>>set >>>> up >>>> to commit to the new repositories, and I won't have to sift through >>>> things >>>> that I'm unfamiliar with. I see that Patrick has already done this >>>>with >>>> weinre, which tipped me off. >>>> >>>> Are we doing this right? >>> >>> >>> I think this is exactly what we want to do, modulo having to do global >>> "mark read"s on the torrent of emails flowing into my new filtered >>> "commits" label in GMail. :-) Would be nice to get a single push's >>> commit's bundled into one message, but I reckon this flood is a >>>one-time >>> thing, so ... no worries. >>> >>> Actually, just checked the email, and they're coming from " >>> callback-comm...@incubator.apache.org" - I suppose we should create new >>> ml's for the 3 "callback" ml's we have, to "cordova" ones. >>> >>
