I don't mind it, I think it's good to have an idea of what issues exist / are being reported / are being fixed on the various platform implementations (even if it is not considered "your" platform).
On 12-01-06 9:26 AM, "Ross Gardler" <rgard...@opendirective.com> wrote: >On 6 January 2012 16:52, Patrick Mueller <pmue...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Does anyone actually LIKE having JIRA emails sent to the -dev mailing >>list? >> I find it ... noisy. I've had to tweak some gmail filters to move the >> JIRA traffic to a different label. Browsing through the other apache >> mailing lists, it appears some projects (25) use a separate issues >>mailing >> list for JIRA traffic. That seems to make more sense to me, even if it >> means another mailing list to manage. > >It really depends on how you use JIRA. The problem with having them on >a different list is that any discussion that happens there will be >missed to those not subscribed to that list. For those who are >subscribed there is no difference since the mails all come into your >inbox. > >If JIRA is only used for reporting and tracking work on issues (i.e. >no discussion) then it's not so much of a problem to have separate >lists. > >Ross > >-- >Ross Gardler (@rgardler) >Programme Leader (Open Development) >OpenDirective http://opendirective.com
