Hi Drew. 1) Is there any issue with maintaining the RIM copyright? I believe while we were there back in June, it was understood that significant contributions can have the copyright line added to the standard license block.
2) Let me check with someone here and get back to you on this one. Hope to confirm todayŠ Thanks! -- Ken Wallis Product Manager BlackBerry WebWorks Research In Motion (905) 629-4746 x14369 -----Original Message----- From: Drew Walters <deedu...@gmail.com> Reply-To: <callback-dev@incubator.apache.org> Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2012 13:07:42 -0600 To: <callback-dev@incubator.apache.org> Subject: Re: Apache License swap for BlackBerry >Is anyone from RIM able to comment on the below two items from my previous >email. The second one is basically a question about what >license/copyright >information needs to be reproduced when using code from a knowledge base >article. > >- There are a couple of instances in the code (from Playbook >implementation) for a copyright of RIM. Has RIM agreed to removal of >their >copyright or does that need to be maintained in the source? > >- The StringUtils.java [1] file was apparently based on a BlackBerry >knowledge base article [2] as noted in the file header. Its not clear to >me whether I need to include information in the LICENSE or NOTICE file for >this. --------------------------------------------------------------------- This transmission (including any attachments) may contain confidential information, privileged material (including material protected by the solicitor-client or other applicable privileges), or constitute non-public information. Any use of this information by anyone other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately reply to the sender and delete this information from your system. Use, dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this transmission by unintended recipients is not authorized and may be unlawful.
