> Infra help is always welcome, but is this the key bottleneck? Again, not a big deal. Consider, before: any committer had the capability to grant that right to any other committer. ATM: no committer has that right. (Or perhaps I should say: privilege.)
Subtle difference. Anyhow I think the real bottle neck is balancing learning the Apache Way and getting up to speed. Speaking for myself I misjudged the time it would take to acclimatize to the scene around here. Having built most of our community on services we didn't necessarily admin was a key component to the early success the project formerly known as PhoneGap. Still not entirely convinced of the value of hosting all that infra ourselves w/ the foundation [given the time it takes to do so] but I am committed to seeing us do right by Apache. > The voting periods for both were abnormally long, mostly because of > confusion about who's driving the process. We can and definitely > should improve on that. Agree > Are there other concerns about the process? No, not really
