On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 6:20 AM, Brian LeRoux <b...@brian.io> wrote: > > My issue is that by releasing unified-js over different releases we are > > making it much harder on our users! IMHO we haven't adequately warned > > users about all the upcoming changes. > > Don't disagree its going to break things. What would be best way to > let the users know? Shipping early and fixing before 2.x seems > pragmatic to me. (Would prefer a rock solid major release and unstable > point release.) >
Are odd-numbered point releases advertised as unstable? Should they be? What is the downside to cutting a release with only congruent improvements and bug-fixes? > > > I'll get off my soapbox now, but I do believe we should be catering to > our > > users a bit more. > > Agree --- you think its worthwhile if I prep a big ol' blog post > warning them of the changes, why we're making them? > Personally I am also curious about why the changes are considered for general(?) release in a staggered fashion.
