I'm skeptical. I'm going to test it on this end with a raw WebView to confirm.
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 9:12 AM, Simon MacDonald <[email protected]>wrote: > Yeah, I think it is a security exception in Android 4. Apparently, > Google doesn't want WebView's using DB's. > > Simon Mac Donald > http://hi.im/simonmacdonald > > > > On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 11:57 AM, Filip Maj <[email protected]> wrote: > > DangŠ I'm a fan of code-shaving. > > > > On 2/29/12 8:42 AM, "Simon MacDonald" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >>-1 > >> > >>There is a bug in Android 4.0.3 that requires the shim to be there or > >>WebSql DB's won't work. Bryce has the details. > >> > >>Simon Mac Donald > >>http://hi.im/simonmacdonald > >> > >> > >> > >>On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 8:54 PM, Filip Maj <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> This makes perfect sense for me and shaves off a bunch of code from the > >>> repo. +1 > >>> > >>> On 12-02-15 3:27 PM, "Joe Bowser" <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > >>>>Hey > >>>> > >>>>Since we're not supporting Android 1.5 and 1.6 anymore, I don't see the > >>>>need to have the DroidDB shim. I understand it was for Android 3.0 > >>>>support, but since Android 3.0 has been upgraded into virtual obsolence > >>>>I'm > >>>>thinking we should cut support for it as well on the tablet side and > >>>>have > >>>>our baseline be Android 3.1 for Android Tablet support. That way we > can > >>>>get rid of the DroidDB shim and not have to patch for WebSQL. > >>>> > >>>> > http://developer.android.com/resources/dashboard/platform-versions.html > >>>> > >>>>Is everyone cool with removing support for Android 3.0? There are far > >>>>less > >>>>people using it than there are Android 1.5 devices out there, and I > >>>>don't > >>>>see this number ever increasing. > >>>> > >>>>Joe > >>> > > >
