Challenge accepted! Sent on the TELUS Mobility network with BlackBerry -----Original Message----- From: Filip Maj <[email protected]> Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 14:41:03 To: [email protected]<[email protected]> Reply-To: [email protected] Subject: Re: qunit total tests
Thanks for volunteering to convert the Qunit tests to Jasmine, guys! That is great! On 3/22/12 2:04 PM, "Dave Johnson" <[email protected]> wrote: >+1 to ducking / jasmine > >On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 1:21 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: >> +1 for jasmine >> >> Ducks beside brian >> Sent on the TELUS Mobility network with BlackBerry >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Brian LeRoux <[email protected]> >> Sender: [email protected] >> Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 13:12:37 >> To: <[email protected]> >> Reply-To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: qunit total tests >> >> seems like a qunit thing --- but agree this would be very help ful. >> or, at least, a listing of what didn't run. =/ >> >> I really hate to reignite this but maybe we think again on moving to >> jasmine for mobile-spec >> >> *ducks >> >> On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 12:00 PM, Drew Walters <[email protected]> >>wrote: >>> Is there a way for the mobile-spec autotests (qunit) to report the >>> full number of possible tests as oppose to executed tests when it >>> reports its "# tests of # passed" message at the top when it >>> completes. >>> >>> I would like to have a more trackable number of failures between OS >>> versions/platforms. For instance on BB, this is what I get on various >>> OS versions: >>> >>> OS 5 697 of 736 >>> OS 6 760 of 776 >>> OS 6 device 762 of 789 >>> OS 7 710 of 735 >>> OS 7.1 727 of 748 >>> >>> To me it seems like the total number of tests should be constant >>> whether they are executed or not.
