Congrats! Your phone didn't come out of a vending machine! On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 8:22 AM, Simon MacDonald <[email protected]>wrote:
> Installed and it looks like everything worked. > > Simon Mac Donald > http://hi.im/simonmacdonald > > > > On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 11:02 AM, Joe Bowser <[email protected]> wrote: > > We don't have enough crap Android devices running 2.3. This is to also > > help us buy devices for the device wall. The application can be found > here: > > > > https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.infil00p.phoneTest > > > > On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 7:11 AM, Simon MacDonald > > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > >> Great idea Joe. I've got a Samsung Galaxy S running 2.3.5 so lemme > >> know when it is up. > >> > >> But wait, isn't this a job for the PhoneGap Device Wall! > >> > >> http://phonegap.com/2012/03/29/phonegaps-new-device-wall/ > >> > >> Simon Mac Donald > >> http://hi.im/simonmacdonald > >> > >> > >> > >> On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 8:18 PM, Joe Bowser <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > OK, I published a test app on Google Play. I'll post the link once it > >> > actually shows up. I want people to download and run it on their > Android > >> > 2.3 devices to see if we can find any that crash! If so, it'll be > >> recorded > >> > in the Error Report. That way we can finally know is this is a real > bug > >> or > >> > something that only exists in the Emulator. > >> > > >> > I'll throw up the code on a repo somewhere as well. I made sure to > use > >> > zero permissions so that it's clear what the app is. (I bet it gets > >> really > >> > crap ratings!). > >> > > >> > Joe > >> > > >> > On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 4:46 PM, Brian LeRoux <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > > >> >> +1 science > >> >> > >> >> On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 4:33 PM, Joe Bowser <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> >> > On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 2:01 PM, Bryce Curtis < > [email protected] > >> >> >wrote: > >> >> > > >> >> >> Yes, I meant providing your own classes that inherit from our > >> >> >> CordovaChrome/WebView classes. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> From what I've observed recently, addJavascriptInterface is still > >> >> broken in > >> >> >> the emulator and on some (maybe small subset) of real phones. > >> >> >> > >> >> > > >> >> > I just tested it on the emulator. However, I don't think this is > an > >> >> issue > >> >> > on real phones. When they wrote the switch, it was meant to allow > >> >> Android > >> >> > 2.3 to run on crap like the Quench. So far, I have never seen a > phone > >> >> that > >> >> > has less than 256 MB of RAM produced, not even the HTC Wildfire > (and > >> that > >> >> > phone sucked!). I honestly don't think that there's a single > Android > >> 2.3 > >> >> > phone that has this bug. > >> >> > > >> >> > I think I'm going to release an application to prove this point. > FOR > >> >> > SCIENCE! > >> >> > > >> >> > Joe > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> >> On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Joe Bowser <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 9:09 PM, Bryce Curtis < > >> [email protected] > >> >> >> > >wrote: > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > I really haven't had time to look at this in detail, but agree > >> that > >> >> >> > > anything related to the webview should be in CordovaWebView. > As > >> Fil > >> >> >> > > mentioned, that includes the history, plugin manager, > >> whitelisting, > >> >> & > >> >> >> > > authentication + callback server. > >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > I assume that overriding chrome/view clients so the user can > >> specify > >> >> >> > their > >> >> >> > > own will still work. > >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > What do you mean overriding Chrome/View clients? You can use > your > >> own > >> >> >> > classes if they inherit from the CordovaChrome class or > >> CordovaWebView > >> >> >> > class, but if you just cram a vanilla WebViewClient or > >> >> WebChromeClient, > >> >> >> > Cordova won't work at all. This has nothing to do with > >> >> CordovaWebView, > >> >> >> but > >> >> >> > instead is a consequence of the prompt hack that acts as our > >> current > >> >> >> > bridge. If we want to make it so that we're not dependent on > the > >> >> >> > ChromeClient, we should probably bring back > addJavascriptInterface > >> and > >> >> >> put > >> >> >> > it in the view itself. > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > BTW: Does the emulator still break when we do this on Android > 2.3? > >> I > >> >> >> think > >> >> >> > I'll have to look into that. > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > Joe > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 6:17 PM, Filip Maj <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > > Sorry for late reply Joe! > >> >> >> > > > > >> >> >> > > > Looks great! As for outstanding issues as per your wiki > article > >> >> [1], > >> >> >> I > >> >> >> > > > would say move everything WebView related, as well as > >> >> >> Cordova-specific > >> >> >> > > > such as the plugin manager, into CordovaWebView.java. My > >> thinking > >> >> >> here > >> >> >> > is > >> >> >> > > > that, none of scaffolding necessary to enable device APIs in > >> the > >> >> web > >> >> >> > view > >> >> >> > > > should be a burden on the user - the CordovaWebView class > >> should > >> >> >> handle > >> >> >> > > > all of that. > >> >> >> > > > > >> >> >> > > > It separates the cordova-y bits as something the WEbView > needs > >> to > >> >> >> > manage > >> >> >> > > > on its own, as well, and cleans up the final > Activity-extending > >> >> class > >> >> >> > to > >> >> >> > > > be simpler. Our end users should not have to worry about > that > >> >> stuff, > >> >> >> > nor > >> >> >> > > > do they need to see it in their own activities, or the > >> generated > >> >> >> > > > activities the baseline tooling within cordova-android > >> provides. > >> >> >> > > > > >> >> >> > > > IMO: history, plugin manager, whitelisting, authentication, > >> should > >> >> >> all > >> >> >> > be > >> >> >> > > > handled by CordovaWebView. > >> >> >> > > > > >> >> >> > > > [1] http://wiki.apache.org/cordova/CordovaWebView > >> >> >> > > > > >> >> >> > > > On 3/28/12 4:06 PM, "Joe Bowser" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> >> > > > > >> >> >> > > > >BUMP! Are we all on board with doing this? > >> >> >> > > > > > >> >> >> > > > >Joe > >> >> >> > > > > > >> >> >> > > > >On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 1:15 PM, Joe Bowser < > >> [email protected]> > >> >> >> > wrote: > >> >> >> > > > > > >> >> >> > > > >> Hey > >> >> >> > > > >> > >> >> >> > > > >> I've been working on the CordovaWebView branch, and I > think > >> we > >> >> >> need > >> >> >> > to > >> >> >> > > > >> discuss where to put the CallbackServer and > PluginManager in > >> >> the > >> >> >> new > >> >> >> > > > >> implementation. I'm OK with it being in the view, but I > did > >> >> have > >> >> >> it > >> >> >> > > in > >> >> >> > > > >>the > >> >> >> > > > >> Client before, and I'm wondering what people's thoughts > are > >> on > >> >> >> that. > >> >> >> > > > >>Also, > >> >> >> > > > >> since these are core pieces of Cordova on Android, this > may > >> >> break > >> >> >> > the > >> >> >> > > > >> branch, which is fine, but it'd be good if more people > >> looked > >> >> at > >> >> >> > this > >> >> >> > > > >> branch, and discussed how this should work. > >> >> >> > > > >> > >> >> >> > > > >> > >> >> >> > > > >> > >> >> >> > > > >> > >> >> >> > > > > >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > >> >> > >> > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-cordova-android.git;a > >> >> >> > > > >>=shortlog;h=refs/heads/CordovaWebView > >> >> >> > > > >> > >> >> >> > > > >> http://wiki.apache.org/cordova/CordovaWebView > >> >> >> > > > >> > >> >> >> > > > >> Joe > >> >> >> > > > >> > >> >> >> > > > > >> >> >> > > > > >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > >> >> > >> >
