So I pushed some of my work for converted the mobile-spec to jasmine: https://github.com/gtanner/incubator-cordova-mobile-spec
Currently converted: - battery - accel - camera - capture (don't run the all test harness as it will probably break ;)) I should be able to finish converting the tests quickly and I have been testing on the PlayBook. Thought I would give everyone a heads up and allow you to bask in the awesome of running "X of Y" tests where Y is a number that actually is useful. Gord On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 2:54 PM, Gord Tanner <[email protected]> wrote: > On another note, I might have a branch locally here where I am converting > the tests to jasmine ...... just saying ;) > > > On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 2:53 PM, Gord Tanner <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I pushed my changes for network for you (did a pull request to your >> fork). It seems ok but I don't have much context as to what was broken / >> not working on the playbook to start ;) >> >> >> On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 2:31 PM, Brian LeRoux <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Man those variable test result #'s drive me nuts. >>> >>> On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 11:23 AM, Filip Maj <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > Ahh dang. Hopefully for 1.7 then, but we're awfully close. >>> > >>> > On 3/29/12 5:55 AM, "Drew Walters" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > >>> >>For the record, here are the mobile-spec results I received for >>> >>various OS levels while developing my branch for the cordova-js merge >>> >>(* indicates actual device, others are simulators): >>> >> >>> >>OS Level Model Result >>> >>-------------- --------- ---------- >>> >> 5.0.0.713 9550 698-736 >>> >> 6.0.0.246 9800 760-776 >>> >>*6.0.0.600 9800 763-789 >>> >> 7.0.0.540 9810 761-776 >>> >> 7.1.0.130 9860 763-776 >>> >> >>> >>Failures were reviewed to confirm they were expected failures that >>> >>pre-existed the cordova-js merge (compass, media, storage, etc.). >>> >>There are more passing/executed now then before the cordova-js merge >>> >>but this is mainly due to API's existing (compass, media, etc.) which >>> >>did not before, even though those API's have no native implementation >>> >>behind them. >>> >> >>> >>On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 8:33 PM, Drew Walters <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Correct. I'm not committing the Cordova-js blackberry merge until we >>> >>>have >>> >>> playbook at a state that matches 1.5. >>> >>> >>> >>> On Mar 28, 2012 7:47 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> >>> >>>> I know he mentioned that blackberry was fine but playbook still >>> needs a >>> >>>> little work. >>> >>>> >>> >>>> I have a few commits to playbook locally but still feels a little >>> off. >>> >>>> >>> >>>> Gord >>> >>>> ------Original Message------ >>> >>>> From: Tim Kim >>> >>>> To: [email protected] >>> >>>> ReplyTo: [email protected] >>> >>>> Subject: Re: Tag BlackBerry for 1.6.0rc1? >>> >>>> Sent: Mar 28, 2012 8:34 PM >>> >>>> >>> >>>> > >>> >>>> > If so: dude. Rad. MERGE THAT SHIZZLE IN AND TAG RC1!!! >>> >>>> >>> >>>> I'm afraid I cannot just yet - I cannot commit so ya. Also, I think >>> I'd >>> >>>> like to know what Drew thinks because it's pretty much all of his >>> >>>>commits. >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> Sent on the TELUS Mobility network with BlackBerry >>> > >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Gord Tanner >> Senior Developer / Code Poet >> tinyHippos Inc. >> @tinyhippos >> >> > > > -- > Gord Tanner > Senior Developer / Code Poet > tinyHippos Inc. > @tinyhippos > >
