Do you have proof that addJavascriptInterface is faster despite the fact that we're not using WebView.loadUrl? I seriously think we're missing a large part of the picture if we don't account for that.
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Anis KADRI <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > I wonder how other frameworks get > > around this issue? > > > They don't as it's a 2.3 emulator only issue. > > +1 for adding addJavascriptInterface back it's just 10x faster for > everything other than simple operations (like taking a picture). > > > > > > On Monday, May 7, 2012, Filip Maj wrote: > > > > > Something to chalk up on the todo list: test all of the Adobe VAN + SF > > > office Androids with that app you put out. > > > > > > >We can bring addJavascriptInterface > > > >back, but I don't think it's going to magically make things better. > > > > > > Maybe we could do a benchmark between XHR, prompt and addJSInterace and > > > see which one has best performance. And this might sound crazy but > maybe > > > even open our methodology and numbers up ;) > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Simon Mac Donald > > http://hi.im/simonmacdonald > > >
