Why does that mean we'll be cutting a different type of release? You mean it's different cause we are including the scripts? I'm missing something here.
On 6/19/12 1:15 PM, "Michael Brooks" <[email protected]> wrote: >Cool, I can do that. > >So are planning to ship the CLI scripts with the release? If so, that >means >we'll be cutting a different type of release for each platform in 1.9.0. >We'll need to know what the looks like in order to document it. > >Michael > >On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 1:13 PM, Brian LeRoux <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I'd like to see those in 1.9 ---if you put the skeleton in and point >> out where the actual docs go I'm happy to take first stab >> >> On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 4:05 PM, Michael Brooks >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Bump. >> > >> > I'm curious what date we should set for the CLI Guides. >> > >> > Will release 1.9.0 be shipping the CLI scripts? If so, we may want to >>put >> > together the guides for 1.9.0. Otherwise, we can hold off for 2.0.0. >> > >> > Michael >> > >> > >> > On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 2:36 PM, Michael Brooks >><[email protected] >> > >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> Good idea >> >> >> >> >> >> On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 2:33 PM, Filip Maj <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> The baseline+inconsistent CLI scripts available always lived in the >> >>> README >> >>> but having a full-fledged guide/article would be nice + linkable as >> well. >> >>> +1 >> >>> >> >>> On 6/5/12 2:28 PM, "Brian LeRoux" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> >Today we have Getting Started guides which walk the developer >>through >> >>> >the right buttons to click in their IDE. Soon we will have most of >>the >> >>> >plumbing cleaned up for the CLI so I'm thinking we have a second >>set >> >>> >of getting started guides but focused on CLI usage only. >> >>> > >> >>> >Thoughts? >> >>> >> >> >> > >>
