A few reasons for the existing structure : - the repo was singular to help users discover plugins - moving to individual repos would destroy commit histories for plugins ( so we should minimize the number of times we move them ) - the repo itself has grown far beyond what was expected, it was meant to be a 'for now' solution to be re-addressed when we had solidified a better plugin installation/discovery mechanism ( in progress, but overdue based on this repo ... )
Cheers, Jesse @purplecabbage On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 2:23 PM, Mike Reinstein <reinstein.m...@gmail.com> wrote: > @Bryan: I believe each plugin basicallly does have its own repo, and this > is mirrored in our "official" repo. > > @Don: great, thanks for adding your plugin info! > > > > On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 5:19 PM, Bryan Bishop <kanz...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 3:59 PM, Mike Reinstein <reinstein.m...@gmail.com >> >wrote: >> >> > - popularity of plugins is unclear because the git stars is for the >> > whole repo, not individual plugins >> > >> >> Is there any reason each plugin shouldn't have its own separate repo? >> >> - Bryan >> http://heybryan.org/ >> 1 512 203 0507 >> -- @purplecabbage risingj.com
