ya the past is irrelevant. since we're moving to npm for the pkg mgmt we should probably move to an extension of package.json
instead of clobbering andrew's work (and creating work for him) we should have a light module in-between that is responsible for marshaling between the formats. this stuff is decidedly not hard but certainly not interesting or fun. On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 9:41 AM, Filip Maj <f...@adobe.com> wrote: > Probably no reason other than "because Andrew wrote it and that's what he > chose" > > On 10/11/12 3:20 AM, "Mike Reinstein" <reinstein.m...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >If this is an old discussion/argument I'm sorry for re-hashing this. I'm > >wondering why express the plugin manifest in xml, when its managed in > >node/javascript which handles json natively. There doesn't seem to be any > >significant nesting or complex XML within the doc thus far. Intentional > >design decision? Any info on this would be enlightening and helpful. > > > >thanks, > > > >-Mike > >
