I have used both of these dances  a couple times over
this year!    Beatrice seems to be the easier for
folks to get in their heads so I didn't need to keep
calling all the way through  -  I found SHutesbury
needed me to keep calling longer.   I like them both -

 THanks for Shutesbury
--- mavis mcgaugh <[email protected]> wrote:

> Beatrice    Becket 1/4 Left     Erik Hoffmann
> 
> A1)  Circle Left 3/4                                
>  
>     w/ Neighbor D-S-D 1  1/2 
>                                 ---- Prog
> A2)  W/Next Neighbor  Balance & Swing
> 
> B1) with these Neighbors -  
>         Down the Hall - 4 - in - line  
>           turn as couple - come back - cast around
> 
> B2)  LL  forward & Back 
>       Ladies Chain across to Partner
> 
> C1)   Hey for  4  [ Ladies Lead Pass R]
> 
> C2)  Partner Balance &  Swing  
> 
>               dance starts again with these
> Neighbors
> 
> --- Peter Amidon <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > Hi Mavis,
> > 
> > I think Beatrice is a fantastic three-part French
> > Canadian tune, so
> > I would guess Erik wrote the dance for that tune.
> > 
> > I wrote a three part dance once, to go with a
> three
> > part tune
> > that some musicians wanted to play, that I thought
> > would be great,
> > but which flopped when I tried it.
> > 
> > I learned a great three part dance from David
> Kaynor
> > 
> > Shutesbury Reel
> > by David Kaynor
> > 3 part contra dance
> > 
> > A1: Circle L X1 & Swng N
> > A2: Down Center, turn as couples and return
> > B1: Face across & full hey
> > B2: Dsd NEW N (#1's look Dwn, #2's look up) RHT N
> > 1.75
> > C1: M take LH-Blanc Wavy line, M pull by L & Swing
> > Partner
> > C2: Circle L 3/4, Blnc ring, Ptnr Calif twirl
> > 
> > I can't remember which tune he used for it, but it
> > was a classic New England 3 part tune.
> > 
> > I have called that twice.  Once it worked, and the
> > other time it didn't work that well.  I think it
> is
> > a great dance that I have to learn a little more
> > thoroughly.
> > 
> > My experience is that contra dancers are so used
> to
> > the AABB format that if you call a three-part
> dance
> > it had better be a very good and intuitive dance,
> > and you had better be prepared to know it inside
> > out and upside down for efficient teaching and
> > very clear, memorized prompting.  I think a good
> > three-part dance can be a great change for
> > experienced dancers.
> > 
> > Are you able to share the Erik Hoffman 3-part
> dance?
> > 
> > Best,
> > 
> > Peter
> > -- 
> > Peter Amidon
> > [email protected]
> > 20 Willow Street
> > Brattleboro, VT 05301
> > 802-257-1006
> > cell: 917-922-5462
> > http://www.amidonmusic.com
> > http://www.dancingmasters.com
> > 
> >    I have never been lost, but I will admit to
> >      being confused for several weeks.
> > 
> >                         -Daniel Boone
> > _______________________________________________
> > Callers mailing list
> > [email protected]
> >
> http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers
> > 
> 
> 
> Mavis L McGaugh
> 510-814-8118 (answering machine-leave message)
> 
> 
> 
>  
>
____________________________________________________________________________________
> Sponsored Link
> 
> Degrees online in as fast as 1 Yr - MBA, Bachelor's,
> Master's, Associate
> Click now to apply http://yahoo.degrees.info
> _______________________________________________
> Callers mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers
> 


Mavis L McGaugh
510-814-8118 (answering machine-leave message)

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

Reply via email to