----- Original Message ----- From: "Jerome Grisanti" <[email protected]>
Subject: [Callers] Triple Minors in the Midwest

I was considering calling a triplet or a duple minor dance with contra
corners in the first half to make sure everyone was comfortable with that
figure, and then calling "Sackett's Harbor" in the second half, which turns
the minor set 90 degrees (or 270 degrees, to be technical) so all the men
are all facing the stage and the women are facing down.
I find this a hoot! Traditionally Sackett's Harbor is used as the way to introduce folks to contra corners, because it is so much easier in a triple minor than in a duple minor! Just goes to show that what ya know is always easier than what you don't know.

I want to lay out the rules of [triple minors] very succinctly: Ones remain ones all the way down the hall, while the twos become threes and then twos again
as they progress up. Threes also alternate roles, becoming twos and then
threes again. At the top, the first couple out waits out two iterations of
the dance before becoming ones. At the bottom, the threes must trade places
with the ones or they will remain out indefinitely.
I wan to agree with Alan that too much discussion is problematic and saying "waits out two iterations" is actually inaccurate. The couple progressing up the set actually waits out three time, but (again as Alan so clearly pointed out) since two of the waiting out times are together and the other is earlier, most folks think it is only twice. I think he has the best wording when he says "you cannot start until you have two couples ready to dance with you" or something similar.

Are these rules accurate as stated?

Any suggestions from New England? Elsewhere in the Midwest? Points beyond?

Make sure your sets are not too long (nor too short, for that matter.) Pay attention to when you call the band out. It is nice to do so just after a new couple has come in at the top, and it isn't an every other kind of thing as it is in a duple minor. (There's that wait out, in, out, out, in thing again.)

hth,
Beth Parkes

Reply via email to