John - Alan's answer would fit the Midwestern part of America as well. There are people with renewed energy here trying to expand the "acceptable" repertoire, but if you asked a dancer who attends only contra dances about any of this, he/she would want only longways, duple sets with standard moves, a partner swing AND a neighbor swing, and constant motion. They would complain that callers are being self-indulgent merely by calling a square dance. If you called a triple minor, there might be a small rebellion (I speak from experience with this). Four-facing Four is okay, but circle dances are rare except at dances with less experienced dancers at them.
We usually end each half of the dance with a waltz, and our old-time bands have begun following that with a polka at the end of the evening. In the old days (but no more) there would be a hambo at the break. Thanks for bringing up this question and for your perspective. If only the word "céilidh" were easier to spell, I'd probably try to hold one. M E On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 6:05 AM, Alan Winston - SSRL Central Computing < [email protected]> wrote: > John wrote: > > > In a recent post I defined a contra dance as: > > - longways for as many as will > > - first couples Improper, or Becket formation > > - flowing choreography > > - no-one stationary for more than 16 beats (e.g. First Couple Balance & > > Swing, finish facing down to make Lines of Four) > > - containing at least one swing > > - 95% of the moves to be from a set of well-know moves that they know > > already > > (And I would add that most of those figures are connected; dancers are very > rarely asked to go on a track by themselves.) > > > Is that what most Americans understand by a "contra dance"? > > Yes. > > > I asked: > > Are you allowed to do Proper dances at a "contra dance"? Or a > > four-couple dance that has all the other characteristics listed above? > > Or a Sicilian Circle (space allowing)? > > But got no answer. > > It depends somewhat on the community. The big-city (modern urban contra) > scene > tends to devolve toward longways contra, but charismatic, opinionated, and > good > callers can make a difference. > > At contra dances in the San Francisco Bay Area I have seen: > > - squares (and many people sit down for them) > - triplets (and many people complain about gimmicks) > - circle mixers > - four-face-four > - proper contras (rarely) > - triple-minor contras (Sackett's Harbor - but not in the last 10 years) > - scatter mixers > - couple dances: waltz, polka, hambo > > and at contra dance camps/weekends I've also seen > > - grid squares > - Appalachian big circle figures > > > > > > > Taking it a step further - this is a popular dance over here in the UK: > > > Childgrove (Playford 1701) > > A1: Partner Siding; Partner Dosido > > A2: Neighbour Siding; Neighbour Dosido > > B1: Neighbour Two-Hand Turn 1 & 1/2 (skip step) > > Partner Two-Hand Turn > > B2: #1s Full Figure Eight up through the #2s (who can cast to turn > > it into a double-figure-eight if they like) (skip step) > > > It has all the characteristics defined above apart from the swing being > > replaced by a skipped two-hand turn. And of course the moves may not be > > all familiar to contra dancers. If I called that at an American contra > > dance, to great music from a live band, what reaction would I get? > > Depends on the crowd, but it's not something I'd be inclined to try except > under very specific circumstances. > > (Except for crossover English dancers, you'd have to teach siding, your > dosido > would end up with a lot of twirls in it, and you'd have to teach the figure > eight from zero, the two-hand turns at different speeds might be > challenging.) > > If the band plays it as they would for an English dance, the contra dancers > won't know what to do with it (as I know from sad experience). If you play > it > like a contra dance tune, you won't get an English dance out of it. > > (I bet Cammy Kaynor could sell it to his dancers, though.) > > I was recently at a contra dance camp which had a late-night "Trash > English" > session. Bluesy, swingy, low-down versions of English tunes, and dancers > responding to them with contra and swing body language and flourishes, > using > the original figures as an armature on which to hang those variations. > Great > music, strong dancers, really fun. Childgrove would have been fine there. > > Hope that helps somewhat. > > -- Alan > > > -- > > =============================================================================== > Alan Winston --- [email protected] > Disclaimer: I speak only for myself, not SLAC or SSRL Phone: > 650/926-3056 > Paper mail to: SSRL -- SLAC BIN 99, 2575 Sand Hill Rd, Menlo Park CA > 94025 > > =============================================================================== > > _______________________________________________ > Callers mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers > -- As you set out for Ithaka, pray that your journey be long, full of adventure, full of discovery... May there be many summer mornings when, with what pleasure, with what joy, you enter harbors you're seeing for the first time. ~Constantine Cavafy, "Ithaka" 1911
