OK, sounds good to me. We'll have to try it. ... Bob

On Dec 9, 2011, at 3:54 PM, Read Weaver wrote:

> I quite disagree, for experienced gender-free dancers (which is the bulk of 
> my experience); a reversed courtesy turn (right hand in front, walking 
> clockwise) definitely takes a couple times through before it's comfortable. 
> And it could well be harder for someone who's used to both roles of a regular 
> chain—if I've never been the lady in a ladies' chain, I may find it easier to 
> do a (reversed) gents' chain since it isn't almost-but-not-quite what I'm 
> used to.
> 
> --Read Weaver
> Jamaica Plain, MA
> lcfd.org
> 
> On Dec 9, 2011, at 12:46 PM, Robert Golder wrote:
> 
>> A "Bands Chain" dance is a better choice as a challenging dance for a venue 
>> where role-free dance is atypical. In a role-free setting, men as well as 
>> women are comfortable with dancing either role in a chain, so in practice 
>> there's really nothing very special about a bands chain. ... Bob
>> 
>> On Dec 9, 2011, at 7:39 AM, Luke Donforth wrote:
>> 
>>> Hello All,
>>> 
>>> In the near future, I get to call for my first gender free dance. I'm
>>> looking forward to it, and thinking about my program. I was contemplating
>>> putting in Bands chains. The gents chain is a move that seems by and large
>>> ignored in conventional contra dancing; the occasional dance I've seen
>>> using it is usually greeted with grumbling. Are gender free dancers more
>>> open to the move?
>>> 
>>> I was thinking of the following dance (where barearms are on the right
>>> after a swing)
>>> 
>>> *A1*
>>> Neighbor Balance and Swing
>>> *A2*
>>> Promenade Neighbor across and courtesy turn
>>> Barearms chain across the set (pull by right)
>>> *B1*
>>> Barearms do-si-do 1x
>>> Partner swing
>>> *B2*
>>> Bands chain across (pull by left, courtesy turned by neighbor)
>>> Right Hand Star 1x
>>> 
>>> I've sent the question directly to the dance organizer, and I'm
>>> cross-posting on facebook, but I also wanted to poll the folks here.
>>> Thoughts?
>>> 
>>> Thanks.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Luke Donforth
>>> [email protected] <[email protected]>
>>> www.lukedonev.com
> _______________________________________________
> Callers mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers

Reply via email to