another good point.  maybe good flow alternating with a chance to catch your 
breath is the recipe for a really good dance :-)
 

> Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 09:39:33 -0800
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Callers] heys for new dancers
> 
> And some of those dances that flow so well, flow because they keep going in 
> one 
> direction (usually clockwise) almost the whole time, resulting in very 
> nauseous 
> dancers. It has happened to me many times (mostly as a dancer). Please watch 
> out 
> for this when choosing a very flowy dance. Count the number of bars in a 
> dance 
> spent moving clockwise (circle L, gypsy, swing, allemande R, orbit...). 
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: tavi merrill <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Sent: Sun, February 19, 2012 10:58:17 AM
> Subject: Re: [Callers] heys for new dancers
> 
> Yeah Beth! I couldn't agree more... the courtesy turn is so underestimated
> in how much coordination dancers must have to do it gracefully, and the
> regional variation in R&L through can be befuddling... but heys are so
> wonderfully innocuous, provided the ratio of experience levels is
> appropriate.
> 
> It's interesting how organizers' and dancers' experience with the
> overcomplicated ways some callers teach specific moves biases them against
> the move rather than against a caller's overcomplicated teaching method :
> / As a developing caller i'm finding that the best way to learn is
> listening to dancers talk about what teaching methods they've seen work
> well versus badly. Listening to dancers has radically improved my teaching
> all around.
> 
> When it comes to dances with good "flow", i'm learning they (can) be a
> double edged sword. I love how Bob put it that in Flirtation Reel "the body
> WANTS to go in the right direction, and the soul follows". However, a
> fellow caller pointed out to me recently that some dances which "flow"
> beautifully also have high piece count. In his opinion, sometimes dances
> which have a moment to pause between moves (eg. ladies' chain to circle L)
> are good because they give newbies a moment to think/digest the motion.
> Still figuring out how i feel about that idea on a dance-by-dance basis.
> Either way, it strikes me how often we humans can take a good rule-of-thumb
> and make it a terrible ironclad principle.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> > On Feb 18, 2012, at 2:43 PM, [email protected] wrote:
> >
> > > LOL, I once had a caller berate me for using Flirtation Reel as a
> > > dance to teach beginners (this was a beginner's workshop at NEFFA,
> > > they really were beginning something.) He rather emphatically said
> > > "how could you use a non-standard hey as a teaching tool?" Until
> > > then I hadn't realized there was a standard vs. a non-standard hey.
> > > Actually I still don't think there is.
> > >
> > > I don't remember who the caller was, but I do remember the comment
> > > <G>.
> > >
> > > I also once had a dance organizer inform me "Do not teach a hey in
> > > the first half of the evening." There are so many other moves that
> > > people think are easy that are actually quite difficult for new
> > > folks: right and left through for example. Banning a hey seems a bit
> > > arbitrary, but I assume the dance had a bad experience at some time.
> > >
> > > Beth
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Linda Leslie
> > > Sent: Friday, February 17, 2012 11:24 PM
> > > To: Caller's discussion list
> > > Subject: Re: [Callers] Heys for new dancers
> > >
> > >
> > > On Feb 17, 2012, at 7:55 AM, barb kirchner wrote:
> > >
> > >>
> > >> i like teaching "the ladies' pattern".  ladies walk the same path
> > >> (turn left, end on right) for a promenade, right and left through,
> > >> ladies chain, and hey.  they're kinda used to looping out a little,
> > >> because in the first three figures, they're actually walking around a
> > >> person - easy enough to get the concept of walking around a ghost
> > >> from
> > >> there.
> > >>
> > > Certainly useful techinique, if heys you will be using for the
> > > evening are right in the center, left shoulder at the ends.
> > > Flirtation Reel is a good example of Left shoulder in the center,
> > > right shoulder at the ends. Most dancers don't have trouble with
> > > this difference, but I have  occasionally had dancers be a bit
> > > surprised that heys can and do vary.
> > > Linda
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 3
> > Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2012 02:28:28 +0000
> > From: barb kirchner <[email protected]>
> > To: <[email protected]>
> > Subject: Re: [Callers] Heys for new dancers
> > Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
> >
> >
> > any dance that has good "flow" is going to be easier for dancers, old and
> > new.  when you find them, you keep them - because they work.
> >
> >
> > Message: 4
> > Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2012 00:45:49 -0500
> > From: Robert Golder <[email protected]>
> > To: Caller's discussion list <[email protected]>
> > Subject: Re: [Callers] Heys for new dancers
> > Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> >
> > If there is a "standard" in hey dances, then Flirtation Reel is the gold
> > standard. It is a perfect blend of aesthetics and ergonomics. It works
> > because the body WANTS to go in the right direction, and the soul follows.
> >
> > I have just returned from calling a little community dance of 1/3
> > experienced dancers and 2/3 beginners, much as Linda described. Of course
> > we danced Flirtation Reel. Committed to memory for use at a moment's
> > notice, Flirtation Reel is at the top of my list of dances that are
> > accessible to newcomers, but reward my experienced folks on the floor for
> > hanging in there. ... Bob
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Callers mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Callers mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers
                                          

Reply via email to